With the media freaking out over Trump’s recent tweet lets take a look at the time Hillary Clinton called for a drone strike on Julian Assange.
Clintonâ€™s State Department was getting pressure from President Obama and his White House inner circle, as well as heads of state internationally, to try and cutoff Assangeâ€™s delivery of the cables and if that effort failed, then to forge a strategy to minimize the administrationâ€™s public embarrassment over the contents of the cables. Hence, Clintonâ€™s early morning November meeting of Stateâ€™s top brass who floated various proposals to stop, slow or spin the Wikileaks contamination. That is when a frustrated Clinton, sources said, at some point blurted out a controversial query.
â€œCanâ€™t we just drone this guy?â€ Clinton openly inquired, offering a simple remedy to silence Assange and smother Wikileaks via a planned military drone strike, according to State Department sources. The statement drew laughter from the room which quickly died off when the Secretary kept talking in a terse manner, sources said. Clinton said Assange, after all, was a relatively soft target, â€œwalking aroundâ€ freely and thumbing his nose without any fear of reprisals from the United States. Clinton was upset about Assangeâ€™s previous 2010 records releases, divulging secret U.S. documents about the war in Afghanistan in July and the war in Iraq just a month earlier in October, sources said. At that time in 2010, Assange was relatively free and not living cloistered in in the embassy of Ecuador in London. Prior to 2010, Assange focused Wikileaksâ€™ efforts on countries outside the United States but now under Clinton and Obama, Assange was hammering America with an unparalleled third sweeping Wikileaks document dump in five months. Clinton was fuming, sources said, as each State Department cable dispatched during the Obama administration was signed by her.
Clinton and other top administration officials knew the compromising materials warehoused in the CableGate stash would provide critics and foreign enemies with a treasure trove of counterintelligence. Bureaucratic fears about the CableGate release ultimately proved to be well founded by Clinton, her inner circle and her boss in the White House. The revelations of these U.S. diplomat generated correspondences were damaging on many levels, and among thousands of examples, included:
- One cable detailed a discussion between Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh and Gen. David H. Petraeus where Saleh indicates he would cover up and accept blame for Americaâ€™s missile strikes against al-Qaeda in Yemen.
- U.S. diplomats offered various countries a meeting with President Obama and untold millions of dollars, if these countries agreed to accept detainees from the Guantanamo Bay prison.
- U.S. diplomats engaged in low-level spying by collecting foreign diplomatsâ€™ personal information, including credit card numbers to track their global travel itineraries.
- The cables also exposed the sensitive behind-the-scenes diplomacy involved in winning sanctions against Iran,
- The cables exposed U.S. officialsâ€™ plan to extract highly enriched uranium from Pakistan,
- Intelligence was divulged on North Koreaâ€™s ties to Tehranâ€™s weaponry program, how it helped Iran obtain missiles that could strike Moscow and Western European cities.
- Documents were released naming Arab officials and their concerns and complaints about Iranâ€™s nuclear program,
- One such leak detailed King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia pleading withÂ the United States to â€œcut off the head of the snake,â€ meaning Iranâ€™s nuclear program.
- In cables from U.S. diplomats, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin is described as an â€œalpha-dog.â€
- Afghan President Hamid Karzai, confidential U.S. diplomat correspondences alleged, was â€œdriven by paranoia.â€
- German Chancellor Angela Merkel â€œavoids risk and is rarely creative.â€
- Gaddafi spends much time in public with a â€œvoluptuous blondeâ€ Ukrainian nurse.
- Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian prime minister, â€œappears increasingly to be the mouthpiece of Putinâ€ in Europe after receiving â€œlavish giftsâ€ including large energy contracts thanks to the negotiationsÂ of a â€œshadowy,â€ Russian-speaking Italian intermediary.
- And thousands more of additional intelligence revelations along the same lines.
Following Clintonâ€™s alleged drone proposal, another controversial remedy was floated in the State Department to place a reward or bounty for Assangeâ€™s capture and extradition to the United States, sources said. Numbers were discussed in the realm of a $10 million bounty. A State Department source described that staff meeting as bizarre. One minute staffers were inquiring about the Secretaryâ€™s blue and black checkered knit sweater and the next minute, the room was discussing the legalities of a drone strike on Assange and financial bounties, sources said.
Immediately following the conclusion of the wild brainstorming session, one of Clintonâ€™s top aides, State Department Director of Policy Planning Ann-Marie Slaughter, penned an email to Clinton, Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, and aides Huma Abebin and Jacob Sullivan at 10:29 a.m. entitled â€œan SP memo on possible legal and nonlegal strategies re Wikileaks.â€
â€œNonlegal strategies.â€ How did that phrasing make it into an official State Department email subject line dealing with solving Wikileaks and Assange? Why would the secretary of state and her inner circle be discussing any â€œnonlegal strategiesâ€ for anything whatsoever? Against anyone? Shouldnâ€™t all the strategies discussed by the countryâ€™s top diplomat be strictly legal only? And is the email a smoking gun to confirm Clinton was actually serious about pursuing an obvious â€œnonlegal strategyâ€ proposal to allegedly assassinate Assange? Numerous attempts were made to try and interview and decipher Slaughterâ€™s choice of email wording, however, she could not be reached for comment. Insiders said Slaughter is keeping a â€œlow profileâ€ in Princeton, NJ until she is nominated for a position in Clintonâ€™s cabinet if the Democrat is elected in November. Likewise, True Pundit attempted to contact Mills, Abedin, and Sullivan for their perspectives on this story. None commented on the record.
Slaughterâ€™s cryptic email also contained an attached document called â€œSP Wikileaks doc final11.23.10.docx.â€ That attachment portion of Slaughterâ€™s â€œnonlegal strategiesâ€ email has yet to be recovered by federal investigators and House committee investigators probing Clintonâ€™s email practices while at State. Even Wikileaks does not have the document. Slaughter, however, shed some light on the attachment: â€œThe result is the attached memo, which has one interesting legal approach and I think some very good suggestions about how to handle our public diplomacy.â€
But did it also include details on the â€œnonlegal strategiesâ€ teased in the subject line?
Sources confirm Clinton took the email and attachment with her to the White House for an afternoon meeting with Secretary of Defense Bob Gates and National Security Advisor Tom Donilon prior to an additional evening meeting at the White House. President Obama, sources said, did not attend the early meeting with Gates as he was traveling with Vice President Joe Biden. President Obama did attend the second meeting, however, and Wikileaks and Assangeâ€™s planned release of secret cables were discussed at length, sources said. Attending this meeting were President Obama, Clinton, Gates, Donilon, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Michele Flournoy, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral â€œMikeâ€ Mullen, Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. James Cartwright as well as a half dozen or more various policy aides, sources confirmed.
Did Clinton also share her alleged morning query of droning Assange with the members of the National Security Council and the President? Was it discussed among the top secret subjects in the meeting? Or was Clinton planning to conduct or hatch her own secret foreign policy in defiance of the President, a likely violation of the Logan Act?
Now, almost six years after allegedly threatening to assassinate Julian Assange, some former State Department personnel believe perhaps Clintonâ€™s comments were an attempt at brevity or humor by the former secretary of state, sources said. But since when is Clinton known for her beaming sense of humor and wit? Joking or not, is it appropriate for the top diplomat of the United States to even jest about droning the Wikileaks founder, largely considered an international journalist and whistle blower? State Department personnel would not talk on the record about the Assange meetings or Clintonâ€™s comments. But sources familiar with the meeting said their recollections were jarred again by a recently released report from the FBIâ€™s July interview with Clinton where she acknowledged a penchant for discussing drone strikes to eliminate troublesome foes.
The FBIâ€™s 302 report from Clintonâ€™s email investigation interview, again, specified that Clinton had â€œmany discussionsâ€ related to â€œnominatingâ€ drone strikes on individuals:
â€œClinton could not recall a specific process for nominating a target for a drone strike and recalled much debate pertaining to the concurrence process. Clinton knew there was a role for DOD, State and the CIA but could not provide specifics as to what it was. Due to a disagreement between these agencies, Clinton recalled having many discussions related to nominating an individual for a drone strike. When Clinton exchanged classified information pertaining to the drone program internally at State, it was in her office or on a secure call. When Clinton exchanged classified information pertaining to the drone program externally it was at the White House. Clinton never had a concern with how classified information pertaining to the drone program was handled.â€
Sources said Clintonâ€™s comments on neutralizing Assange fits a pattern of callousness when combined with the FBI testimony that she often considered droning individuals and then coupled with her reaction to Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafiâ€™s death in Oct. 2011.
Gaddafi was tortured and killed, largely due to Clintonâ€™s maneuvering in the Middle East and Libya. During a sit down interview with CBS News, a Clinton aide notified the room during a taping break of news reports that Gaddafi had been dragged throughout the streets of Libya and ultimately killed. Unaware the camera was still rolling, a jovial and proud Clinton pronounced: â€œWe came. We saw. He died.â€ This was Clintonâ€™s initial response to the dictatorâ€™s demise. A cackling Clinton was then joined in laughter by the CBS correspondent and off-camera aides and staff. Â Again, more proof of a disturbing habit of treating human life as a disposable commodity like a soiled diaper.
Unable to legally counter or stop Wikileaks, and likely abandoning any and all legal and â€œnonlegal strategies,â€ Clinton and her staff were forced to weather the collateral damage of CableGate. In fact, just five days after Clintonâ€™s meetings on Mahogany Row in the State Department and the White House, Wikileaks began releasing cables to news outlets globally on Sunday November 28, 2010.
Shortly after CableGate, the WikiLeaks founder sought refuge from authorities and threats by hiding at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.
Now 45, Assange is in his fifth year living quarantined inside the embassy. Clinton remains the Democratic nominee for the presidency of the United States.
â€” WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) August 10, 2016
Is this considered calling for violence against journalists?