WOW: Dick’s, Walmart decision to not sell certain Rifles to people under 21 ‘probably illegal’

According to an analysis by Law and Crime Dick’s Sporting Goods and Walmarts decision to stop selling certain types of rifles, ammunition, and shotguns to adults under the age of 21.

Law and Crime:

To begin, this analysis has nothing to do with the Second Amendment because the Bill of Rights is typically interpreted to limit and constrain government action. Dick’s and Walmart are private companies and the Second Amendment has nothing to say about their decision to curtail a class of buyers from purchasing a class of products.

All state laws, however, have quite a bit to say about what private businesses can and cannot do under specific and delineated circumstances.

Of major relevance here: many states and jurisdictions have age discrimination provisions written into their public accommodation laws. Public accommodation laws are usually Constitutionally-allowable regulations on private businesses. In short, they keep public business from unlawfully discriminating against certain classes of individuals on the basis of those classes and provide states with avenues to prosecute and sanction business who run afoul of such laws. Most public accommodation laws are contained within state human rights acts.

Not all state public accommodation laws consider age a protected status–but many states do. The laws in these states effectively ban discrimination against under-21-year-old adults by retail establishments that are open to the public. In other words, in many states, Dick’s and Walmart have telegraphed a very precarious legal position.

In sum, 19 states and jurisdictions have such laws on the books: Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia all have prohibitions against age discrimination by “public accommodations” or publicly accessible retail establishments.

New Hampshire’s law here is typical of such statutes. Codified at NH Rev Stat § 354-A:17, it reads, in part:

It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice for any person, being the owner, lessee, proprietor, manager, superintendent, agent or employee of any place of public accommodation, because of the age, sex, race, creed, color, marital status, physical or mental disability or national origin of any person, directly or indirectly, to refuse, withhold from or deny to such person any of the accommodations, advantages, facilities or privileges thereof…

New Hampshire’s public accommodation statute doesn’t mention guns, firearms or weapons–nor does it contain a reference to another statute mentioning guns, firearms or weapons–meaning there’s likely no exception for age-based discrimination in the Live Free or Die State. That is, New Hampshire’s public accommodation law would seemingly prohibit Dick’s and Walmart from enforcing their ban on under-21-year-old adults.

The same goes for Connecticut, the Constitution State. Ditto Delaware’s public accommodation provisionsIllinois is no differentNeither is Louisiana. Let’s jump down the list and go backwards a bit:

D.C. doesn’t have a gun-specific exception which allows retail discrimination based on the (arbitrary) age-range of 18-20. How about the Virginias? NopeNeither one of themAnd the story’s the same in Tennessee, too.

Montana’s public accommodation law perhaps comes closest to allowing such age-based discrimination by retailers to occur. The first line of Montana’s public accommodation statute reads, “Except when the distinction is based on reasonable grounds, it is an unlawful discriminatory practice for the owner, lessee, manager, agent, or employee of a public accommodation…”

This is a shocking analysis and one that we haven’t seen covered by any news outlets. The leftist media is to busy congratulating these big corporations for taking a progressive stand than if they are violating the law or the rights of American Citizens. It shocks me that Dicks and Walmart wouldn’t know these laws and it makes me wonder if they are going to go through with this or not.


Share Your Thoughts

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here