According to an Op-Ed from The Washington Examiner’s Byron York, basically everyone knew that Robert Mueller was suffering mental decline while he was special counsel.
The Washington Examiner:
The political world was stunned on July 24, 2019, when Trump-Russia special counsel Robert Mueller testified before the House and Senate. It was not anything Mueller said that shocked observers — it was his demeanor. The 74-year-old special counsel appeared confused at times. He sometimes had difficulty answering the most basic questions. He had difficulty forming complex sentences.
The Mueller at the witness table was a far cry from the Mueller who took over the FBI 18 years earlier. Colleagues remembered a man who was super sharp, on top of everything, a micromanager. Now, many of those watching were concerned.
“This is delicate to say,” former Obama aide David Axelrod tweeted, “but Mueller, whom I deeply respect, has not publicly testified before Congress in at least six years. And he does not appear as sharp as he was then.”
Fox News’s Chris Wallace was more blunt: “I think it’s been a disaster for the Democrats,” he said, “and I think it’s been a disaster for the reputation of Robert Mueller.”
Twitter buzzed with talk about Mueller. But President Trump’s legal team was not surprised.
More than a year earlier, at a meeting in April 2018, the president’s lawyers had gotten a disturbing look at Mueller’s condition. And even before that, they had cause to be concerned about Mueller’s possible cognitive issues and what those problems might mean for the special counsel investigation.
The meeting took place on April 24, 2018. Rudy Giuliani had just joined Trump’s defense team. Attorney John Dowd had left the team, and two other white-collar defense lawyers, Jane and Marty Raskin, had joined. Given all those changes, it was decided that the new lineup should have a get-acquainted meeting with the Mueller team.
After opening niceties, the conversation turned to a number of legal topics and specifically to the longstanding opinion from the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel that a sitting president cannot be indicted. It was not an obscure or arcane issue. It was, in fact, perhaps the key legal question in the entire special counsel investigation. But Mueller could not recall it. The old Mueller, of course, would have known all about it. But on that day in April, the Mueller at the meeting could not remember. It was, to say the least, extraordinary that he could not discuss something so basic to the case.
“Bob said, ‘I’ll have to get back to you on that,'” recalled Giuliani, “and it was apparent that he didn’t know what we were talking about.” A Mueller staffer stepped in to cover for the special counsel, assuring the Trump team that the prosecutors knew about the issue and would get back to them. “There were a couple of other little facts that came up — it didn’t seem like he knew about them,” Giuliani remembered, “and [Mueller’s staff] would lean over and tell him.”
That was the only time Giuliani ever met with Mueller face-to-face. Afterward, “I had no more contact with him,” Giuliani said. “None of us did until it was over.” Lawyer Jane Raskin, who was also in the meeting, had the same experience. “After that, we never met with Mueller, and we never spoke with him on the phone,” Raskin recalled. “It was all Jim Quarles and Andrew Goldstein” — two of Mueller’s senior prosecutors.
Throughout this time, Giuliani kept in touch with Dowd, the former Trump defense lawyer. The two sometimes discussed Mueller’s demeanor. “I said, ‘John, I’m really surprised about how little he knows about the case,'” Giuliani recalled. The issues weren’t really that complicated, and Mueller had been in it for a year. Giuliani thought Mueller was perhaps just not giving it his all. “John said, ‘I had the same impression,'” Giuliani remembered. “He said, ‘I think he sort of retired, he came back to do this, and now, he probably regrets it.’ I said, ‘OK’ — and that’s what I would have told you the day before he testified.” The day Mueller appeared on Capitol Hill, Giuliani saw without any doubt that something was wrong.
Here was his Tweetstorm on it:
Some new books on Mueller investigation trying to dance around question of Mueller’s mental acuity during critical days of Trump-Russia probe. Here’s what really happened… 1/18 https://t.co/9Mr0fnnKfT
— Byron York (@ByronYork) September 24, 2020
Go back to July 24, 2019. Mueller testified before Congress. Observers were shocked. He appeared confused at times, had difficulty answering basic questions. Trouble forming complex sentences. 2/18
— Byron York (@ByronYork) September 24, 2020
Go back to July 24, 2019. Mueller testified before Congress. Observers were shocked. He appeared confused at times, had difficulty answering basic questions. Trouble forming complex sentences. 2/18
— Byron York (@ByronYork) September 24, 2020
The Trump defense team was *not* surprised. They had seen it themselves. Back in April 2018 had meeting with Mueller. One topic: Well-known DOJ policy that sitting president cannot be indicted. Huge part of Mueller investigation. And Mueller couldn’t remember it. 3/18
— Byron York (@ByronYork) September 24, 2020
Trump team stunned. The old Robert Mueller would have known everything about it. But 2018 Robert Mueller fumbled, could not recall. Said ‘I’ll have to get back to you on that.’ And this was not on obscure, arcane issue but matter central to investigation. 4/18
— Byron York (@ByronYork) September 24, 2020
Was last time Trump team ever spoke to Mueller. Mueller staff built wall around him. Trump lawyers never saw Mueller again, never spoke to him on phone. 5/18 https://t.co/9Mr0fnnKfT
— Byron York (@ByronYork) September 24, 2020
Months before, in February 2018, former Trump communications adviser, former DOJ colleague of Mueller, was interviewed by prosecutors. Mueller himself dropped by to say hello. Adviser concerned by Mueller appearance. Asked Mueller staff: Is Bob OK? They said he was great. 6/18
— Byron York (@ByronYork) September 24, 2020
Then, after report written, Mueller, aides went to DOJ to brief Attorney General Barr. Mueller hands trembling, weak, aides did most of talking. Barr wondered: Is he OK? 7/18
— Byron York (@ByronYork) September 24, 2020
Then Democrats demanded Mueller testify on Hill. Undaunted by failure to establish collusion, they wanted Watergate moment. Televised hearing, Mueller delivering searing indictment of Trump, public rising up in support of impeachment. Didn’t happen that way. 8/18
— Byron York (@ByronYork) September 24, 2020
Mueller didn’t want to testify. Barr gave him an out, said ‘If [Mueller] decides he doesn’t want to be subjected to that, the DOJ will certainly back that.’ Message to Mueller: You don’t have to put yourself through this. But Democratic pressure was great. Disaster unfolded. 9/18
— Byron York (@ByronYork) September 24, 2020
All of this is recounted in my new book, ‘Obsession: Inside the Washington Establishment’s Never-Ending War on Trump.’ 10/18 https://t.co/gSN1MlATze pic.twitter.com/UPcTgG46k5
— Byron York (@ByronYork) September 24, 2020
Now, there are three other books covering Mueller. One, by Jeffrey Toobin, ignores Mueller cognitive issue. Another, by New York Times’ Michael Schmidt, says NYT heard about Mueller problems in days leading up to July 2019 hearing. 11/18
— Byron York (@ByronYork) September 24, 2020
Schmidt, NYT asked Mueller officials about Mueller mental acuity. Were told there was no problem, was offensive that they would even ask. NYT never reported the story. 12/18
— Byron York (@ByronYork) September 24, 2020
So what does it all mean? Why it is important? Think back to when Mueller was appointed. He hired a lot of Democratic donors, including one (Weissmann) who actually attended Hillary Clinton 2016 election-night event. 14/18 https://t.co/9Mr0fnnKfT
— Byron York (@ByronYork) September 24, 2020
When Trump protested, Mueller defenders jumped in. Bob Mueller is straight down the middle, they said. Scrupulously fair. He will keep those prosecutors in line. He will be in charge. 15/18 https://t.co/9Mr0fnnKfT
— Byron York (@ByronYork) September 24, 2020
Then Trump defenders began to see that Mueller wasn’t in charge, or wasn’t fully in charge. ‘Bob at the end was AWOL,’ said Jay Sekulow. ‘He showed up for cameo appearances.’ 16/18 https://t.co/gSN1MlATze
— Byron York (@ByronYork) September 24, 2020
Sekulow: ‘[Mueller] was the Wizard of Oz. He was back behind the big curtain, pulling some strings here and there, but when you pulled the curtain away, he wasn’t even really the one pulling the strings.’ 17/18 https://t.co/gSN1MlATze
— Byron York (@ByronYork) September 24, 2020
The story is just coming out now, with ‘Obsession’ and other accounts. Link: Trump team suspected Mueller cognitive decline. https://t.co/9Mr0fnnKfT
And ‘Obsession’: https://t.co/gSN1MlATze 18/18 End.— Byron York (@ByronYork) September 24, 2020
This gives us more evidence that Robert Mueller was the head of the probe but really wasn’t running the thing. He was the special counsel in name only.
Conservatives called this out from the beginning:
Trey Gowdy on Mueller: “The person who learned the most about the Mueller report today was Bob Mueller. … He clearly didn’t write the report which means those under him did which means the issue of bias is all the more important. It was a terrible day if you are a Democrat ” pic.twitter.com/oS9oJt1zEJ
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) July 24, 2019
One of the lawyers held a fundraiser for Biden:
Andrew Weissmann, former lead prosecutor on Mueller’s special counsel team, is headlining a June 2nd virtual fundraiser for Biden. pic.twitter.com/3lq7ld5m0u
— Ken Thomas (@KThomasDC) May 21, 2020
Even WaPo reported that Mueller’s team was full of Democrats:
But publicly available voter registration information shows that 13 of the 17 members of Mueller’s team have previously registered as Democrats, while four had no affiliation or their affiliation could not be found.
Nine of the 17 made political donations to Democrats, their contributions totaling more than $57,000. The majority came from one person, who also contributed to Republicans. Six donated to Hillary Clinton, Trump’s opponent in the 2016 race.
The Palmieri Report is a Pro-America News Outlet founded by Jacob Palmieri two years ago at the age of 19. Since its founding, it has gotten over 2M pages views and over 20k followers. The Palmieri Report is dedicated to giving people the truth so that they can form their own informed political opinions.