According to a new study, Twitter censorship made the Hunter Biden story nearly 2x more popular.

Technology Review:

When Twitter banned, and then unbanned, links to a questionably sourced New York Post article about Joe Biden’s son Hunter, its stated intention was to prevent people from spreading harmful false material as America heads into the final stretch of the election campaign. But thanks to the cycle of misinformation—and claims from conservatives that social-media platforms are deliberately censoring their views—Twitter managed to do the opposite of what it intended.

According to Zignal Labs, a media intelligence firm, shares of the Post article “nearly doubled” after Twitter started suppressing it. The poorly-thought-through ban triggered the so-called Streisand Effect and helped turn a sketchy article into a must-share blockbuster. And then on Friday, the Republican National Committee filed a Federal Election Commission complaint against Twitter, claiming that the ban “amounts to an illegal corporate in-kind political contribution to the Biden campaign.”

Here is the data they found.

Zignal Labs tracked mentions and shares of the Hunter Biden story this week. Looking at the firehose of Twitter shares of the URL—including original tweets, retweets, and quote tweets—Zignal found a surge of shares immediately after Twitter instituted the block, jumping from about 5.5 thousand shares every 15 minutes to about 10 thousand. This doesn’t necessarily mean the block caused the explosion in interest, but the surge corresponds with a series of widely shared tweets from Trump supporters and conservatives accusing the platform of political censorship.

The New York Post story, which was blocked on Twitter for about a day, was shared 352,200 times on the platform. Facebook, meanwhile, didn’t block people from linking directly to the story, but did announce that it was treating it as questionable and would limit its reach until third-party fact checkers could examine it (this is a policy Facebook announced in 2019 as part of its plan to combat election misinformation). The story still had 324,000 shares there, not including those inside private groups.

What a major backfire for Big Tech. Authoritarians like these CEOS never get it. The more you try to censor the truth the more popular it gets. However, I will say that this doesn’t mean censorship isn’t a major problem. The reason they couldn’t fully censor it is because of the amount of right-wing personality who attacked Twitter over this. Once those personalities are gone Twitter will be able to keep everything they don’t want off the platform.

Twitter is officially not letting anyone share the Hunter Biden story that broke from the New York Post earlier today.


From The New York Post’s Op-Ed Editor:


This is disgusting. I never want to hear anything again about Twitter not being left-leaning. I never want to hear again that Twitter isn’t a threat to free expression on the internet. They are actively shutting down the ability to share an article from one of America’s biggest newspapers.

We know why they are doing this as well. They aren’t doing this because the story is fake or misleading. They are doing this because it hurts Joe Biden.

Twitter never shutdown the pee tape conspiracy theories. They never shut down the Russian hoax conspiracy theories. This is clearly an effort to just protect Joe and Hunter Biden.

The Palmieri Report is a Pro-America News Outlet founded by Jacob Palmieri two years ago at the age of 19. Since its founding, it has gotten over 2M pages views and over 20k followers. The Palmieri Report is dedicated to giving people the truth so that they can form their own informed political opinions.

Click To Go To ProTrumpNews.com

CLICK TO SUPPORT US AND BUY OUR SHIRTS

Share Your Thoughts

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.