The Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost has asked the Supreme Court to rule on the electors’ clause portion of the Texas SCOTUS case.
I asked SCOTUS to rule on the Electors Clause question presented in Texas’s lawsuit. It is unconstitutional for judges and bureaucrats to change the rules set by state legislatures for selecting electors. pic.twitter.com/DWPAMc5pzE
— Dave Yost (@Yost4Ohio) December 10, 2020
JUST IN – #Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost asks SCOTUS to rule on the Electors Clause question presented in Texas’s lawsuit. “It is unconstitutional for judges and bureaucrats to change the rules set by state legislatures for selecting electors,” he added in a Tweet. pic.twitter.com/GYsGhib8Ry
— Disclose.tv 🚨 (@disclosetv) December 10, 2020
SUPREME COURT.âš–ï¸
“I asked SCOTUS to rule on the Electors Clause question presented in Texas’s lawsuit. It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL for judges and bureaucrats to change the rules set by state legislatures for selecting electors.”
OHIO’S AG is now backing Texas’ SCOTUS lawsuit.🔻 pic.twitter.com/rHXlilatvd
— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) December 10, 2020
This isn’t a full sign on but this is still a bombshell.
Yost is asking the Supreme Court to look into whether or not these states legally changed their election rules.
Of course, we know they didn’t.
President Trump took to Twitter to say the Supreme Court has a chance to save the country.
The Supreme Court has a chance to save our Country from the greatest Election abuse in the history of the United States. 78% of the people feel (know!) the Election was RIGGED.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 10, 2020
This is referring to the Texas election case that is on the Supreme Court docket.
17 states are now backing Texas’ election lawsuit challenging the 2020 election results in four states.
JUST IN – 17 states backing Texas’ SCOTUS lawsuit now (via @kylenabecker) pic.twitter.com/auWgVp3BGd
— Disclose.tv 🚨 (@disclosetv) December 9, 2020
Here we go.
Here are the states:
The 17 STATES listed as backing Texas’ lawsuit against WI, MI, PA & GA in the SUPREME COURT:
MO, AL, AR, FL, NE, ND, OK, IN, KS, LA, MS, MT, SC, SD, TN, UT & WV. pic.twitter.com/uZIoBS5676
— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) December 9, 2020
President Trump took to Twitter to tout the lawsuit that was filed yesterday by Attorney General Ken Paxton.
This lawsuit is challenging the election results in Wisconsin, Georgia, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.
Trump called this the big one.
We will be INTERVENING in the Texas (plus many other states) case. This is the big one. Our Country needs a victory!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 9, 2020
This was not my case as has been so incorrectly reported. The case that everyone has been waiting for is the State’s case with Texas and numerous others joining. It is very strong, ALL CRITERIA MET. How can you have a presidency when a vast majority think the election was RIGGED? https://t.co/ZKu9sNVz2U
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 9, 2020
This must have been in the works for weeks. If the Supreme Court rules in favor of this then the election will officially trend back to President Trump.
This lawsuit would crush the narrative laid out by the Mainstream Media. They have claimed this election was over and Trump lost. Winning this lawsuit would put that result back into question.
Although this lawsuit only challenges four states there is also still the chance that Trump flips Nevada and Arizona as well.
All of these states have had widespread irregularities calling the election results into question.
Get ready.
We reported on this yesterday:
The United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear the Texas election lawsuit that was filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.
BREAKING – U.S. Supreme Court will hear Texas’ lawsuit against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin over potential voter fraud. The case was added to the Supreme Court docket today. pic.twitter.com/BzSsct1Pq9
— Disclose.tv 🚨 (@disclosetv) December 8, 2020
This might just end up deciding the election.
The State of Texas has sued four states citing election irregularities.
The four states are Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.
This case is going to go directly to the Supreme Court.
Just The News:
In a novel legal strike, the state of Texas has asked the Supreme Court to invalidate the election results in Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Georgia, arguing officials in those four battleground states violated the Constitution by making changes to how ballots were cast and counted without legislative approval.
The lawsuit filed late Monday night by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton asked the justices to issue a temporary restraining order preventing the states “from taking action to certify presidential electors or to have such electors take any official action including without limitation participating in the electoral college.”
The suit argues that changes made by the state’s governors, secretaries of states and election supervisors were “inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.”
🚨 BREAKING 🚨
The state of Texas has sued Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania & Wisconsin over election irregularities!
This means Texas will have original jurisdiction to go directly to the Supreme Court‼ï¸
HUGE â¬‡ï¸ pic.twitter.com/2LqpQ4Ym6y
— Kayleigh McEnany (@kayleighmcenany) December 8, 2020
SUPREME COURT.âš–ï¸
“The 2020 election suffered from significant and unconstitutional irregularities…”
The lawsuit argues the States violated the Electors’ Clause.
Texas’ lawsuit against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan & Wisconsin being filed directly to the SUPREME COURT.🔻 pic.twitter.com/q9vD17ryik
— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) December 8, 2020
Here is a little bit from the Lawsuit:
As set forth in the accompanying brief andcomplaint, the 2020 election suffered from significantand unconstitutional irregularities in the DefendantStates:
• Non-legislative actors’ purported amendments to States’ duly enacted election laws , in violation of the Electors Clause’s vesting State legislatures with plenary authority regarding theappointment of presidential electors
• Intrastate differences in the treatment of voters,with more favorable allotted to voters – whetherlawful or unlawful – in areas administered bylocal government under Democrat control andwith populations with higher ratios of Democratvoters than other areas of Defendant States.
• The appearance of voting irregularities in theDefendant States that would be consistent withthe unconstitutional relaxation of ballot-integrity protections in those States’ election laws.
This could be the game-changer we were waiting for.
How exactly will @nytimes report the Texas SCOTUS lawsuit without at least incidentally acknowledging that someone did something
— Ron Coleman (@RonColeman) December 8, 2020
How exactly will @nytimes report the Texas SCOTUS lawsuit without at least incidentally acknowledging that someone did something
— Ron Coleman (@RonColeman) December 8, 2020
Good article explaining more on this lawsuit:
My quick rundown of the Texas lawsuit against MI, WI, PA, GA here: https://t.co/p2nw7s70tT
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) December 8, 2020
The Palmieri Report is a Pro-America News Outlet founded by Jacob Palmieri four years ago at the age of 19. Since its founding, it has gotten over 2M pages views and over 20k followers. The Palmieri Report is dedicated to giving people the truth so that they can form their own informed political opinions.
