The media refused to cover the bombshell from John Durham which provided more evidence that Trump was being spied on.
They did this because once again they were exposed as lying frauds.
The New York Times finally covered it. What did they do? They covered up for the Deep State.
Twitter went wild calling them out:
What is this from @NYTimes? Looks like an attempt to downplay the latest Durham bombshell. Apparently any story which “requires asking readers to expend significant mental energy and timeâ€raises questions of “whether news outlets should even cover†it 🤨 https://t.co/BCFmduleLS
— Miranda Devine (@mirandadevine) February 15, 2022
Fake News NYT: You're too stupid to understand that Hillary paid operatives to spy on President Trump, so why bother covering it? pic.twitter.com/UQrM1Qkpwd
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) February 15, 2022
Kinda interesting how NYT took a qualified statement from lawyers for Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist hook, line, and sinker.
"TO OUR KNOWLEDGE all of the data they used was nonprivate DNS data from before Trump took office.â€
— Daniel Chaitin (@danielchaitin7) February 15, 2022
So is Sussmann breaking with NYT here?
Even he saw Durham at the very least "implies" he (Sussmann) took White House data after Trump took office
— Daniel Chaitin (@danielchaitin7) February 15, 2022
NYT also doesn't address the Trump Tower and Trump apartment building part, and why operatives were feeding this info to the CIA. https://t.co/fmWPplpfuJ
— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) February 15, 2022
Never forget, NYT admitted that Trump was spied on:
For the antidote to media bias, check out ProTrumpNews.com
The Palmieri Report is a Pro-America News Outlet founded by Jacob Palmieri. The Palmieri Report is dedicated to giving people the truth so that they can form their own informed political opinions.Â
Follow us on social media:
GETTR Link–Parler Link–Telegram Link
We appreciate feedback. Click here to send us any comments and corrections.Â
Listen to our Daily News Podcast!
