The Palmieri Report previously reported on the Deep State’s attack on The New York Times.
Attorney Exposes The Real Reason For Biden Admin Raiding Project Veritas
They just got a massive legal win against the New York Times.
Christmas came early for our @dhillonlaw clients #projectveritas #jamesokeefe today! NY Trial court issued devastating opinion ruling that the @nytimes improperly obtained and published its litigation adversary’s non-waived privileged communications: pic.twitter.com/fdgxWiEjdM
— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) December 24, 2021
3/ I’m working to get full opinion up will link it, but bottom line is the @nytimes’ discovery and litigation misconduct was repeatedly called out by Justice Wood, and he threatens prompt sanctions if the paper doesn’t comply!! Kudos to @libbylocke who won this! @ClareLockeLLP
— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) December 24, 2021
From Big League Politics:
The New York Supreme Court has ordered the New York Times to destroy attorney-client memos illegally obtained from Project Veritas, in a ruling on Christmas Eve with potential legal ramifications for the FBI.
It’s believed the memos in question, believed to be obtained in FBI searches of James O’Keefe’s mobile phone, were illegally leaked to the New York Times in an attempt to sully Project Veritas’ reputation.
The FBI search of O’Keefe’s mobile phone stems from the publication of a story involving Ashley Biden’s diary, originally obtained by Project Veritas and later published at conservative news website National File.
More from Project Veritas’ Chief Legal Officer:
How did NYT obtain the memos? Poss. "improper means" : "The Times incredibly admitted that here 'no apparent bribery was used to obtain the memoranda.' … [PV] has met its burden of showing [the memos] were obtained by irregular means, if not both irregular and improper means."
— Jered Ede (Project Veritas Chief Legal Officer) (@Jtaylorede) December 24, 2021
The Times/corp. media argued prior restraint. Wrong. "The Times is perfectly free to investigate, … publish, opine, expose or ignore whatever aspects of Project Veritas its editors in their sole discretion deem newsworthy, without utilizing [PV's a/c] privileged memoranda."
— Jered Ede (Project Veritas Chief Legal Officer) (@Jtaylorede) December 24, 2021
Of the Times' journalism, the court noted: … "''Hit and run' journalism is no more protected under the First Amendment, than speeding on a crowded sidewalk is permitted under a valid driver's license.'" #ouch.
— Jered Ede (Project Veritas Chief Legal Officer) (@Jtaylorede) December 24, 2021
A hard-fought victory by the indefatigable @libbylocke of @ClareLockeLLP, who frequently reminds the NYT that, contrary to internal belief, they are not the most powerful entity in the State of New York.
— Jered Ede (Project Veritas Chief Legal Officer) (@Jtaylorede) December 24, 2021
For the antidote to media bias, check out ProTrumpNews.com
The Palmieri Report is a Pro-America News Outlet founded by Jacob Palmieri. The Palmieri Report is dedicated to giving people the truth so that they can form their own informed political opinions. You can help us beat Big Tech by following us on GETTR , Telegram, and Rumble.
We appreciate feedback. Click here to send us any comments and corrections.Â
Listen to our Daily News Podcast!
