According to former Harvard Statistician Charles J. Cicchetti, Ph.D. the odds of Joe Biden winning Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin after Trump’s early lead was one in a quadrillion.
This is a part of the Texas Lawsuit.
Chances of Biden winning Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin independently after @realDonaldTrump’s early lead is less than one in a quadrillion:
âž¡ï¸ 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000
Chances of him winning collectively is “one in a quadrillion to the 4th powerâ€
Texas v. PA â¬‡ï¸ pic.twitter.com/tOlgPdai3r
— Kayleigh McEnany (@kayleighmcenany) December 9, 2020
From The Election Wizard:
A new lawsuit filed today, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to block four battleground states – Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, from casting “unlawful and constitutionally tainted votes†in the Electoral College.
In the brief submitted to the Supreme Court, Texas includes a declaration from Pacific Economics Group member and USC economics professor, Charles J. Cicchetti, Ph.D.
Dr. Cicchetti is the former Deputy Director at the Energy and Environmental Policy Center at Harvard University’s John Kennedy School of Government and received his Ph.D. in economics from Rutgers University.
According to Dr. Cicchetti, his calculations show the probability of Joe Biden winning the popular vote in the four states independently given President Trump’s early lead in those States as of 3 a.m. on November 4, 2020, is less than one in a quadrillion.
Dr. Cicchetti’s analysis calculates that for Joe Biden to win all four states collectively, the odds of that event happening decrease to less than one in a quadrillion to the fourth power (1 in 1 1,000,000,000,000,0004).
Bombshell.
The Supreme Court has taken this up:
The United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear the Texas election lawsuit that was filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.
BREAKING – U.S. Supreme Court will hear Texas’ lawsuit against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin over potential voter fraud. The case was added to the Supreme Court docket today. pic.twitter.com/BzSsct1Pq9
— Disclose.tv 🚨 (@disclosetv) December 8, 2020
This might just end up deciding the election.
We covered the lawsuit earlier today:
The State of Texas has sued four states citing election irregularities.
The four states are Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.
This case is going to go directly to the Supreme Court.
Just The News:
In a novel legal strike, the state of Texas has asked the Supreme Court to invalidate the election results in Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Georgia, arguing officials in those four battleground states violated the Constitution by making changes to how ballots were cast and counted without legislative approval.
The lawsuit filed late Monday night by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton asked the justices to issue a temporary restraining order preventing the states “from taking action to certify presidential electors or to have such electors take any official action including without limitation participating in the electoral college.”
The suit argues that changes made by the state’s governors, secretaries of states and election supervisors were “inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.”
🚨 BREAKING 🚨
The state of Texas has sued Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania & Wisconsin over election irregularities!
This means Texas will have original jurisdiction to go directly to the Supreme Court‼ï¸
HUGE â¬‡ï¸ pic.twitter.com/2LqpQ4Ym6y
— Kayleigh McEnany (@kayleighmcenany) December 8, 2020
SUPREME COURT.âš–ï¸
“The 2020 election suffered from significant and unconstitutional irregularities…”
The lawsuit argues the States violated the Electors’ Clause.
Texas’ lawsuit against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan & Wisconsin being filed directly to the SUPREME COURT.🔻 pic.twitter.com/q9vD17ryik
— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) December 8, 2020
Here is a little bit from the Lawsuit:
As set forth in the accompanying brief andcomplaint, the 2020 election suffered from significantand unconstitutional irregularities in the DefendantStates:
• Non-legislative actors’ purported amendments to States’ duly enacted election laws , in violation of the Electors Clause’s vesting State legislatures with plenary authority regarding theappointment of presidential electors
• Intrastate differences in the treatment of voters,with more favorable allotted to voters – whetherlawful or unlawful – in areas administered bylocal government under Democrat control andwith populations with higher ratios of Democratvoters than other areas of Defendant States.
• The appearance of voting irregularities in theDefendant States that would be consistent withthe unconstitutional relaxation of ballot-integrity protections in those States’ election laws.
This could be the game-changer we were waiting for.
How exactly will @nytimes report the Texas SCOTUS lawsuit without at least incidentally acknowledging that someone did something
— Ron Coleman (@RonColeman) December 8, 2020
How exactly will @nytimes report the Texas SCOTUS lawsuit without at least incidentally acknowledging that someone did something
— Ron Coleman (@RonColeman) December 8, 2020
Good article explaining more on this lawsuit:
My quick rundown of the Texas lawsuit against MI, WI, PA, GA here: https://t.co/p2nw7s70tT
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) December 8, 2020
The Palmieri Report is a Pro-America News Outlet founded by Jacob Palmieri four years ago at the age of 19. Since its founding, it has gotten over 2M pages views and over 20k followers. The Palmieri Report is dedicated to giving people the truth so that they can form their own informed political opinions.
