The MSM is pushing the narrative that the Obama wiretapping Trump story is dead. This narrative is an extreme falsehood. As Sean Spicer stated this is only the beginning of what will be a long lengthy investigation into Trump’s claims. The investigation will come to one conclusion. That conclusion will be that information from the GCHQ was used by the Obama administration to build a case against President Trump. We will begin by looking at an article from the Guardian.
Snowden’s leak was on the level of Vault 7 for the CIA. They caught the GCHQ red handed spying on private citizens and showed the vast spying network that they had become. It touched on programs such as Tempora and Prism that allowed for not only private citizens to be looked at but that the NSA and GCHQ could share intel with one another.
My video breaking down the entire leak:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=th2FPKe05FY]
So the idea that Obama could’ve not only used the GCHQ but acquired wiretapping knowledge from them is not beyond unreasonable. Loads of accounts have come out touching on this very topic. As we continue to move through the vast facts we come to the next piece of evidence. This evidence is coming to us via Heat Street.
Two separate sources with links to the counter-intelligence community have confirmed to Heat Street that the FBI sought, and was granted, a FISA court warrant in October, giving counter-intelligence permission to examine the activities of ‘U.S. persons’ in Donald Trump’s campaign with ties to Russia.
Comey refused to comment on whether Obama asked for the FISA warrant during the hearing today. Clearly, there was a warrant granted to the Obama administration to look at Donald Trump and his associates.(Their first request was denied)
Now that we understand that there was a FISA request lets see what that allows them to do.
From the same Heat Street article:
The FISA warrant was granted in connection with the investigation of suspected activity between the server and two banks, SVB Bank and Alfa Bank. However, it is thought in the intelligence community that the warrant covers any ‘US person’ connected to this investigation, and thus covers Donald Trump and at least three further men who have either formed part of his campaign or acted as his media surrogates. The warrant was sought, they say, because actionable intelligence on the matter provided by friendly foreign agencies could not properly be examined without a warrant by US intelligence as it involves ‘US Persons’ who come under the remit of the FBI and not the CIA. Should a counter-intelligence investigation lead to criminal prosecutions, sources say, the Justice Department is concerned that the chain of evidence have a basis in a clear warrant.
Now this segment of the article is pretty damning but one line imparticular grabbed my attention:
The warrant was sought, they say, because actionable intelligence on the matter provided by friendly foreign agencies could not properly be examined without a warrant by US intelligence as it involves ‘US Persons’ who come under the remit of the FBI and not the CIA.
Well isn’t that coincidental? The Obama administration requested the warrant because it would allow them to properly examine information from “friendly foreign agencies”. So although the GCHQ wasn’t specifically named we can connect the dots to where that information was going to come from.
We can now move to a report from Micheal Walsh.Â
Walsh cited an article from the January 12th edition of the New York Times :
The article had this to say:
In its final days, the Obama administration has expanded the power of the National Security Agency to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections.
The new rules significantly relax longstanding limits on what the N.S.A. may do with the information gathered by its most powerful surveillance operations, which are largely unregulated by American wiretapping laws. These include collecting satellite transmissions, phone calls and emails that cross network switches abroad, and messages between people abroad that cross domestic network switches.
The change means that far more officials will be searching through raw data. Essentially, the government is reducing the risk that the N.S.A. will fail to recognize that a piece of information would be valuable to another agency, but increasing the risk that officials will see private information about innocent people.
Obama allowed information on private citizens to be shared easier between all 17 intelligence agencies right before Trump was going to take office. This would allow for a few things.
1.It would blow the Russia Trump collusion story way out of proportion
2.It would allow people who normally wouldn’t hear about matters of this magnitude to get there hands on it.
3.It would ensure that the members of the media would get their hands on this material and obviously would run the story.
Coincidence? I think not.
My research has brought up a ton of questions that still need to be answered by not only the FBI and NSA but also the GCHQ. It may be a stretch to say “Obama ordered the “wiretapping” of Trump” but he certainly had knowledge of people in his administration not only “wiretapping” him but also the use of “wiretapped” data from “friendly foreign agencies”
